To view any Haas Case and/or obtain permission to distribute, email cmr@haas.berkeley.edu

 

Reprint Series


A Pyramid of Decision Approaches
Schoemaker, Paul J.H., and J. Edward Russo
36/1  (Fall 1993): 9-31

Under increasing pressure to make better decisions in less time, managers often use the quickest and easiest decision-making method: going on "gut feel." But recent decision research shows that intuition is much less reliable than most people believe. Managers need to use more sophisticated methods. This article describes a series of increasingly accurate (and demanding) decision-making approaches. It starts with purely intuitive choices, which are quickest and least accurate, and then examines heuristic short-cuts and rules-of-thumb. It then discusses more demanding and reliable methods, such as bootstrapping and value analysis. This article then examines the strengths and weaknesses of each approach in terms of speed, accuracy, and justifiability, with illustrative applications to managerial practice. Finally, the authors offer practical advice for managers on how the more sophisticated techniques can be incorporated into the organization.


Current Issue

California Management Review
Vol. 55 No. 3 Spring 2013


Help us Improve

If you have any comments or questions about the California Management Review, please let us know.


Editor's Corner

Want to submit an article?
CMR publishes articles that are both research-based and address issues of current concern to managers.
Learn more >>