Submission Guidelines

California Management Review serves as a source of evidence-based research that inspires, informs, and empowers stewards of modern organizations. We disseminate ideas that engage scholars, educate students, and contribute to the practice of management.

TYPE DESCRIPTION
In-Depth Article 6,000–8,000 words (An original, previously unpublished article, blending academic research and theory with practitioner relevance. Should be well-grounded and academically rigorous as well as include practical takeaways for managers. Will be peer-reviewed.) USE THIS TO SUBMIT TO A SPECIAL ISSUE.
Spotlight Article 3,000–4,000 words (An original, previously unpublished article, with a greater focus on practitioner relevance but still grounded in research. Sharp perspectives on modern concepts, organizations, and challenges, but with a more concise format than an In-Depth article. Will be peer-reviewed.)
Insight 500 to 3,000 words (An original, previously unpublished article focused on timeliness, breadth, and practitioner relevance. Can be a perspective, concept, interview, or frontier. Often more theoretical than an "In-Depth" or "Spotlight" article, and is fully Open Access. Online only and NOT a CMR journal publication.)
Quick Submit 500–8,000 words (An original, previously unpublished manuscript, outline, or proposal. Use this if you’re unsure which Manuscript Type to choose or if you’re trying to assess whether your idea/article is a good fit. We will advise you within seven (7) business days.)
Berkeley Haas Case 1,500-3,000 words (For Haas faculty only. Either proposal or full draft.)


Spotlight

Manuscript Central  

All submissions are processed within our online system. Please log in or create an account here.

Browse Spotlight  

View our latest spotlight articles.

  • There is no fee for submitting a Spotlight article for publication consideration in CMR.

  • CMR does not accept simultaneous submissions, meaning we will not consider your submission if you’ve simultaneously submitted it to any other outlet for publication consideration.

  • CMR does not give publication consideration to manuscripts that have been previously published in other outlets.

  • The author(s)' name should not appear anywhere in the manuscript, charts, figures, graphs, or filenames.

  • Manuscripts should be double-spaced with 12 point font and run approximately 3,000 to 4,000 words, excluding charts, tables, figures, and end notes.

  • Tables, charts, figures, and diagrams should be uploaded as separate documents (in their native format) with references for insertion throughout the document.

  • If your submission is properly received, we will send you an automated “confirmation of receipt” within 24 hours. If you do not receive this e-mail, contact CMR immediately, as your submission most likely did not go through.

  • If your submission will not be sent out for peer review, you will be notified within four (4) weeks.

  • If your submission is selected for peer review, authors can typically expect a preliminary publication decision within 6 to 10 weeks. There are exceptions to this timeframe. E.g, if your submission is part of a special issue, the timeframe will likely be longer.

  • Accepted articles are generally published within 3 to 6 months. There are exceptions to this timeframe.

  • Spotlight articles should aim to deliver concise, credible, and actionable research insights, expressly tailored for practitioners navigating real-world management challenges.

  • Spotlight submissions should offer sharp perspectives on modern concepts, organizations, and challenges. They should be notably shorter than In-Depth articles and written in a style that is less academic, thus following a concise format for faster consumption. They should also provide direct guidance for practicing managers by beginning with a short list of “Key Recommendations” that emanate from the most novel aspects of the article. (See below)

  • Designed for contributors who want their most timely, impactful ideas to reach those who are actively shaping strategy and operations today.

Key Recommendations
  • Determine the 3-4 most interesting and unexpected research findings from your submission that might appeal to a manager, and base your Key Recommendations on them.

  • They should instruct how a manager might leverage these findings to create value in their organization.

  • They should be structured in two parts to include:

    1. A brief recommendation for the high-level practice that will create value in their organization, and
    2. A specific example of something the manager can do to actualize that high-level, value-add practice.

  • Both should be succinct, yet specific & prescriptive.

Examples

Lessons from Netflix's Success
Sayan Chatterjee


Abstract
This article demonstrates how Netflix has dominated the streaming market by staying focused on the same profit logic from inception. One tactic that is unique to Netflix is being able to exploit factor market inefficiencies to source their inputs much more inexpensively than others. The principles described can be used by myriad businesses across many industries.

Key Recommendations
  • Treat competitors as R&D partners: Open selective parts of your innovation process to outsiders—even rivals—to accelerate capability building.
  • Exploit overlooked and undervalued assets before others see their worth: Proactively search for suppliers or partners who undervalue their assets and lock in favorable deals before the market recognizes their potential.
  • Focus on profit logic, not industry convention: Choose customers and markets that align with your profit engine—even if it means ignoring “obvious” opportunities.
  • Turn funding constraints into innovation drivers: When capital is costly, let financial discipline dictate creative constraints in product design.


Data Breaches: Fight AI with AI
Mohammad Rajib Uddin, Shahriar Akter, Wai Jin Thomas Lee, and Shlomo Y. Tarba


Abstract
AI-driven data breaches have emerged as one of the biggest challenges for corporations. New threats emerge daily in the form of personalized spear phishing messages, deceptive emails, deepfake voice or video, and disinformation. Research in this domain has so far focused primarily on what measures should be taken after a data breach; however, it remains unclear what capabilities are required to defend a company. To address the unknown and unknowable threats, the study presents how firms can develop AI-powered dynamic capabilities to tackle the next level of AI-generated threats.

Key Recommendations
  • Build an AI-centered security culture: Make AI literacy and security awareness part of every employee’s daily practice.
  • Lead ambidextrously, balancing today’s defenses with tomorrow’s innovations: Invest simultaneously in robust basics and forward-looking AI defenses.
  • Treat training as a permanent campaign, not a project: Run continuous, evolving security drills and awareness programs for everyone, including leadership.
  • Turn governance into a competitive advantage: Treat encryption, access control, and selective data sharing practices as proactive value drivers.


Speak and Spend: Voice AI in E-Commerce
Chenshuo Sun


Abstract
Voice AI boosts customer spending: Adopting a voice shopping channel led to an immediate surge in customer spending. Our evidence-based academic research shows that consumers who started using a smart speaker for purchases increased their weekly online spending by about 16.6% in the first four months. Crucially, this uplift wasn’t just a one-time spike – voice AI helped form new habits that kept these customers spending more in the long run.

Key Recommendations
  • Use voice AI to turn routine purchases into loyalty engines: Make it effortless for customers to reorder familiar products by voice for biggest sales lift.
  • Convert novelty into sustained engagement: Continuously refresh the voice shopping experience with new features, smarter dialogue, and multi-modal capabilities to keep users engaged beyond the initial excitement.
  • Treat voice as an omnichannel catalyst, not a stand-alone tool: Design voice AI to complement, not replace, existing channels—syncing carts, wish lists, and recommendations across platforms.
  • Leverage voice to expand digital inclusion: Optimize voice interfaces for older adults, less tech-savvy customers, and people with accessibility needs by using clear prompts, order confirmations, and simplified interactions.


  • CMR follows the Chicago Manual of Style, 18th Edition . Please consult the full online style manual as a resource for general guidelines.

  • Articles should be as jargon-free as possible. Terminology and acronyms that are not common knowledge should be defined. Technical material should be placed in notes or appendices whenever possible.

  • Three descending levels of headings should be used periodically and consistently throughout the article. They should be descriptive but brief.

  • Accurate formatting and validation of references is the responsibility of the author(s). Submissions with improper references will not be processed. CMR uses endnote style (not footnotes) for references and follows the Chicago Manual of Style, 18th Edition (Notes) format. CMR does not use APA or MLA.

    Examples
    Online
    Article
    Hamilton Mann, “Escaping Technological Stockholm Syndrome: The Case for Artificial Integrity in AI Design,” California Management Review Insights, September 10, 2025, https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2025/09/escaping-technological-stockholm-syndrome-the-case-for-artificial-integrity-in-ai-design/.
    Journal Lorraine Chen Idson et al., “Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Nongains: A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36, no. 3 (2000): 252–74, https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1402.
    Book Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder, The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today (University of Chicago Press, 2022), 117–18.


  • Please note that in journal citations with three or more authors, only the first author is listed (with et al.). Repeat citations use shortened notes (which replace ibid and op. cit.). Other style and format questions should refer to the Chicago Manual of Style 18th Edition (Notes) .

  • There are many online citation generators (e.g., zbib.org ), but not all work well, so authors using these generators must independently ensure accuracy and compliance with the correct citation style. Please double-check your selected style.

  • Tables, charts, diagrams, and other graphic materials should be used for providing necessary information or clarification of central concepts. They should be clean and uncluttered and should appear on separate pages. If copyright permission is required for publishing this graphic material, it is the author's responsibility to obtain it at his/her cost.

  • Please provide high-resolution, native figures or files for your charts and figures in your submission.

  • Please make sure to separately upload the individual native files for any charts and figures instead of embedding them in the manuscript document. If you are unable to upload them in the system, please send them as attachments in a separate email to cmr@haas.berkeley.edu. Alternatively, you can send an email that includes a link to where we can download them.

  Submit a Manuscript

California Management Review

Published at Berkeley Haas for more than sixty years, California Management Review seeks to share knowledge that challenges convention and shows a better way of doing business.

Learn more