California Management Review
California Management Review is a premier professional management journal for practitioners published at UC Berkeley Haas School of Business.
California Management Review
serves as a source of evidence-based research that inspires, informs, and empowers stewards of modern organizations. We disseminate ideas that engage scholars, educate students, and contribute to the practice of management.
| TYPE | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| In-Depth Article | 6,000–8,000 words (An original, previously unpublished article, blending academic research and theory with practitioner relevance. Should be well-grounded and academically rigorous as well as include practical takeaways for managers. Will be peer-reviewed.) USE THIS TO SUBMIT TO A SPECIAL ISSUE. |
| Spotlight Article | 3,000–4,000 words (An original, previously unpublished article, with a greater focus on practitioner relevance but still grounded in research. Sharp perspectives on modern concepts, organizations, and challenges, but with a more concise format than an In-Depth article. Will be peer-reviewed.) |
| Insight | 500 to 3,000 words (An original, previously unpublished article focused on timeliness, breadth, and practitioner relevance. Can be a perspective, concept, interview, or frontier. Often more theoretical than an "In-Depth" or "Spotlight" article, and is fully Open Access. Online only and NOT a CMR journal publication.) |
| Quick Submit | 500–8,000 words (An original, previously unpublished manuscript, outline, or proposal. Use this if you’re unsure which Manuscript Type to choose or if you’re trying to assess whether your idea/article is a good fit. We will advise you within seven (7) business days.) | Berkeley Haas Case | 1,500-3,000 words (For Haas faculty only. Either proposal or full draft.) |
All submissions are processed within our online system. Please log in or create an account here.
View our latest spotlight articles.
Lessons from Netflix's Success
Sayan Chatterjee
Abstract
Key Recommendations
Data Breaches: Fight AI with AI
Mohammad Rajib Uddin, Shahriar Akter, Wai Jin Thomas Lee, and Shlomo Y. Tarba
Abstract
Key Recommendations
Speak and Spend: Voice AI in E-Commerce
Chenshuo Sun
Abstract
Key Recommendations
| Online Article |
Hamilton Mann, “Escaping Technological Stockholm Syndrome: The Case for Artificial Integrity in AI Design,” California Management Review Insights, September 10, 2025, https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2025/09/escaping-technological-stockholm-syndrome-the-case-for-artificial-integrity-in-ai-design/. |
| Journal | Lorraine Chen Idson et al., “Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Nongains: A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36, no. 3 (2000): 252–74, https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1402. |
| Book | Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder, The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today (University of Chicago Press, 2022), 117–18. |